Skip to content

What is a ‘vexatious litigant’ & the outcome for Salim Mehajer

What is a ‘vexatious litigant’ & the outcome for Salim Mehajer


Former Deputy Auburn Mayor, Salim Mehajer has been banned from starting any further legal proceedings within NSW as a result of being a ‘vexatious litigant’. The repercussions came as he had continuously launched civil proceedings against former business associates.

Salim Mehajer has recently suffered the repercussions of being declared a ‘vexatious litigant’ following his attempt to sue former business associates for $52 million following a fallout of a development project in Lidcombe.

Salim Mehajer ‘vexatious litigant’ verdict overview

In a decision made by NSW Supreme Court Justice Lindsay, Salim Mehajer will be unable to commence any further civil proceedings without leave from the court to do so.

A lengthy judgement was published on 27 May in relation to the numerous cases that had been commenced by Mehajer over the years that had been vexatious or were for the purpose of harassing or annoying his opponents. This included his current attempt to sue 17 defendants for $52 million and for his previous 10 failed civil cases that he had bought to the courts over the years.

What does the legal term vexatious litigant mean?

The Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) is the governing legislation for such orders to be made and has the purpose of preventing individuals from bringing civil actions that are bought predominantly for the following purposes:

  • to harass or annoy, to cause delay or detriment, or to bring an action for any other wrongful purpose (regardless of the intention or motive of the person who instituted proceedings)
  • to institute proceedings without reasonable grounds
  • to bring proceedings that are an abuse of process of a court or tribunal

Why was Salim declared a vexatious litigant?

Justice Lindsay had found that Mehajer had been a vexatious litigant and had intended to, and did indeed, harass and annoy his opponents within the current proceedings. This was due to the numerous claims he made for damages, inclusive of the suffering of “nervous shock”. It was further stipulated that he was ignoring and trying to circumvent a prior Federal Court judgment regarding his bankruptcy that was declared in 2018.

Salim Mehajer: Consequences of being a vexatious litigant

In total, Justice Lindsay had made 6 orders including placing a stay on Mehajer’s current proceedings and an order to prohibit any further proceedings to be made by him within a NSW court or tribunal without leave from the court. One would have thought the previous failed cases that were commenced (majority with costs ordered) would have served as enough of a deterrent for Mehajer but the result is that the decision is now no longer his.

For further information please don’t hesitate to contact Coutts Lawyers.
1300 268 887

Contact Coutts today.


This blog is merely general and non-specific information on the subject matter and is not and should not be considered or relied on as legal advice. Coutts is not responsible for any cost, expense, loss or liability whatsoever to this blog, including all or any reliance on this blog or use or application of this blog by you.

Contact Us